世界貿易組織(World Trade Organization,簡稱WTO)完全了解其自身正在面臨的危機。
美國前總統唐納德?特朗普破壞了WTO解決貿易爭端的核心功能,而現任美國總統喬?拜登并沒有清除特朗普設置的障礙。此外,全球貿易規則的公平性也引發了普遍的不滿情緒。
在尼日利亞人恩戈齊?奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉的領導下,這個擁有164個成員的國際組織正在面臨許多亟待解決的問題。
然而,最緊迫的危機是:各國之間的新冠疫苗爭奪戰,以及為了盡快結束新冠肺炎疫情,是否應該暫時取消對疫苗專利以及其他知識產權的保護。
印度和南非在去年最先主張新冠疫苗專利豁免。有些支持這種立場的人認為,WTO的未來取決于它接下來對此所做出的決定。
南非駐WTO大使索勒瓦?姆倫比-彼得說:“WTO的信譽取決于它能否在這個問題上取得有意義的結果,是否能夠真正在不同地區增加疫苗產量。”
“最后的致命一擊”
位于日內瓦的WTO并沒有任何實際權力,它只是各國就貿易問題做出重大決策的一個框架,并且通常是以協商的方式。WTO應該作為解決爭端的平臺,因為所有成員國都同意相同的規則。其中最重要的規則之一是《與貿易有關的知識產權協定》(簡稱TRIPS),該協定在1995年WTO成立時正式生效。
這個協定是創立WTO的基礎,其中規定了在特殊情況下豁免專利和知識產權的規則,而且以前確實曾經發生過這種情況:2003年,WTO成員國同意豁免TRIPS中的義務。這些義務曾經導致缺乏生產能力的發展中國家無法進口廉價仿制藥品。(該豁免在2017年成為永久性豁免。)
不過對WTO而言,共識是關鍵。
如果各成員國未能就某項豁免達成共識,WTO成員國就可以以75%的絕對多數通過豁免提案,但這將引發前所未有的動蕩。
如果WTO支持新冠疫苗專利豁免,則意味著其要面對歐盟(尤其是德國)、加拿大和英國等國的反對。
美國的立場最近從反對變成了支持。法國也持同樣立場。
支持者認為,雖然這是各國之間的爭議,但最終結果將對整個WTO產生影響。
公民全球貿易觀察(一個關注WTO和貿易協定的美國倡議組織)的創始人洛里?沃勒克稱:“面對一個世紀以來全人類面臨的最嚴峻的挑戰之一,WTO的功能反而變成了障礙,而不是提供解決方案。我認為這將是對它最后的致命一擊。”
“如果TRIPS豁免成功通過,人們把WTO視為一種拯救生命和生計的解決方案,它就能夠樹立良好的信譽,形成強大的勢頭,可以著手解決嚴重的結構性問題。”
目前,WTO存在的問題數不勝數。
改革迫在眉睫
首當其沖的是負責處理各成員國之間貿易爭端的WTO上訴機構。該機構是國際貿易體系的一個關鍵部分,通常配有七名法官,但由于其不利于美國的決定激怒了特朗普,在有法官退休之后,美國方面一直阻止上訴機構任命新法官。由于法官人數不足,該機構在2019年底徹底停擺。
有人曾經希望拜登上任之后能夠扭轉這種局面,但在今年早些時候,美國拒絕了歐洲提出的填補法官職位空缺的提案,令人大失所望。
拜登政府表示:“美國對WTO上訴機構依舊有系統性擔憂。WTO成員國都知道,在過去的16年多時間里,歷任美國政府都曾經提出并解釋過這種擔憂。”
現任美國貿易代表戴琪在2月的確認聽證會上重申了美國政府的擔憂。她表示,WTO的上訴機構“在多起案件中存在越權裁決、對WTO協定解釋不當等情況,損害了美國和其他WTO成員國的利益”,并指控WTO超期裁決貿易終端。
戴琪指出:“WTO亟需改革,以確保導致這些問題出現的根本原因得以消除。”
香港中文大學的經濟法教授布萊恩?默丘里奧反對疫苗專利豁免。他說:“雖然美國一直在與WTO接觸,但沒有跡象表明美國會在短期內同意對上訴機構法官的任命。這不是好消息。在WTO的治理方面,這比支持知識產權豁免的談判更加重要。”
不止美國希望看到WTO改革。在2月發布的一份重要政策文件中,歐盟表示,推動WTO規則現代化改革的談判以失敗告終,爭端解決制度停擺,對各國貿易政策的監督無效。
于2001年加入WTO的中國也是WTO需要考慮到的重要因素之一。
默丘里奧稱:“中國當前的表現較為強勢,所以對于其認為不符合國家利益的改革措施,它不會被迫接受。”
沃勒克承認,即使WTO成功通過了對新冠疫苗和醫療用品的TRIPS專利豁免,這些問題也不會消失。她補充說:“但是,WTO一旦擁有了成為解決方案而不是障礙的經驗,就可以大幅提高各國解決這些挑戰的意愿和誠意。”
沃勒克提到了亞太經合組織貿易部長在本月初發布的一份聯合聲明。聲明呼吁緊急討論疫苗專利豁免問題。
其中有關WTO改革的部分寫道:“WTO必須證明全球貿易規則有助于解決新冠肺炎疫情這場人類大災難,并推動經濟的復蘇。”
奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉的角色
2021年年初,隨著美國特朗普政府的下臺,奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉成功接任WTO總干事,她的上任沒有受到任何阻撓。她目前正在致力于解決諸多問題,正是這些問題導致了她的前任(巴西人羅伯托?阿澤維多)的離職。
上周早些時候,美國和歐盟就波音和空中客車飛機補貼的長期貿易爭端達成五年休戰協議,當時奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉曾經發布推文稱:“只要有政治意愿,即使最棘手的問題也能夠解決。”
然而,默丘里奧卻懷疑她的管理能力能否對WTO的改革進程產生太大影響。
他說:“她在上任時曾經表示,各國代表團應該相互交流。但在最近的一次總干事會議上,各國代表只是在閱讀事先準備的報告,這被稱為是史上最糟糕的一次會議。
另一方面,恩戈齊與前任不同,她會積極尋找問題的解決方案。如果調解人的角色受到歡迎,她或許不僅可以促成談判,還將對能否最終達成協議產生影響。”
姆倫比-彼得和沃勒克都認為WTO的信譽取決于疫苗專利豁免問題。對于這種觀點,WTO秘書處發言人拒絕發表意見,而是提到了奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉在5月的一次講話。
她在講話中稱,WTO能夠幫助解決疫苗供應鏈的監督和透明,幫助制造商擴大生產,建立一個地理上更多元化的生產基地。
她在講話中還指出,各成員國“必須解決與技術轉讓、專有知識和知識產權有關的問題”,包括專利豁免提案。她說:“我們必須現在行動起來,邀請各國駐WTO大使坐上談判桌進行協商。”
“議程驅動”
大型制藥公司在這個問題上的立場是,WTO成員國不需要支持專利豁免,只要可以推動取消對醫療用品的出口限制即可。
位于日內瓦的國際藥品制造商協會聯合會的總干事托馬斯?庫尼稱:“在消除影響全球疫苗、治療藥物和診斷工具的生產分配的貿易壁壘方面,WTO依舊大有可為。”
“呼吁疫苗專利豁免背后都是出于政治考慮,是為了嘩眾取寵,在短期內不會增加疫苗產量,反而有可能毀掉幫助我們快速應對新冠肺炎疫情的框架。”
默丘里奧也認為姆倫比-彼得和沃勒克的建議都是議程驅動。
他說:“我認為,主張WTO的信譽取決于TRIPS專利豁免的結果這種觀點過于夸張。對某個話題感興趣的人都會用這樣的話術,比如環保主義者會說WTO的信譽取決于漁業補貼的結果,科技界人士會說信譽取決于電子商務和服務談判,而實業家們也會提到同樣的補貼問題。”
然而,沃勒克堅持認為專利豁免的結果不會改變WTO的制度,因為其制度已經臨時暫停了知識產權保護。她說:“這不會對TRIPS協定有任何改變。”
姆倫比-彼得表示:“WTO是一個論壇,它有應對當前疫情的相關政策工具,可以通過解決知識產權壁壘,在不同地區增加疫苗產量。”
國際藥品制造商協會聯合會的總干事庫尼指出,“專利豁免在短期內對緩解新冠肺炎疫情毫無幫助”,因為貿易壁壘和原材料短缺才是根本問題。
新建新冠疫苗生產設施確實需要技術轉讓,然而值得注意的是,在世界衛生組織于去年建立的“新冠肺炎技術獲取資源庫”中,疫苗公司沒有做出任何貢獻。該計劃的目的是希望為疫苗公司提供一種途徑,去自愿幫助愿意參與疫苗生產的其他制造商。
沃勒克表示,大量現有的產能沒有得到充分的利用。
最近,位于以色列的梯瓦制藥發布聲明,抱怨疫苗公司拒絕使用其主動提供的產能。許多公司也有類似的不滿。對此,沃勒克聲稱通過疫苗專利豁免,以及為進一步擴大產能進行注資,可以使疫苗產量快速增加數十億劑。
沃勒克表示:“你的首要任務是先踏上那條路,但隨后你就會看見一道緊鎖的大門。”
南非駐WTO大使姆倫比-彼得說:“當前的新冠肺炎疫情并未減緩,病毒變異和變種風險可能使醫療產品和醫療技術的療效受到影響,許多人的生命危在旦夕,我們希望這一切能夠讓WTO各成員國認識到情況的緊迫性。”(財富中文網)
翻譯:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
世界貿易組織(World Trade Organization,簡稱WTO)完全了解其自身正在面臨的危機。
美國前總統唐納德?特朗普破壞了WTO解決貿易爭端的核心功能,而現任美國總統喬?拜登并沒有清除特朗普設置的障礙。此外,全球貿易規則的公平性也引發了普遍的不滿情緒。
在尼日利亞人恩戈齊?奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉的領導下,這個擁有164個會員國的國際組織正在面臨許多亟待解決的問題。
然而,最緊迫的危機是:各國之間的新冠疫苗爭奪戰,以及為了盡快結束新冠肺炎疫情,是否應該暫時取消對疫苗專利以及其他知識產權的保護。
印度和南非在去年最先主張新冠疫苗專利豁免。有些支持這種立場的人認為,WTO的未來取決于它接下來對此所做出的決定。
南非駐WTO大使索勒瓦?姆倫比-彼得說:“WTO的信譽取決于它能否在這個問題上取得有意義的結果,是否能夠真正在不同地區增加疫苗產量。”
“最后的致命一擊”
位于日內瓦的WTO并沒有任何實際權力,它只是各國就貿易問題做出重大決策的一個框架,并且通常是以協商的方式。WTO應該作為解決爭端的平臺,因為所有成員國都同意相同的規則。其中最重要的規則之一是《與貿易有關的知識產權協定》(簡稱TRIPS),該協定在1995年WTO成立時正式生效。
這個協定是創立WTO的基礎,其中規定了在特殊情況下豁免專利和知識產權的規則,而且以前確實曾經發生過這種情況:2003年,WTO成員國同意豁免TRIPS中的義務。這些義務曾經導致缺乏生產能力的發展中國家無法進口廉價仿制藥品。(該豁免在2017年成為永久性豁免。)
不過對WTO而言,共識是關鍵。
如果各成員國未能就某項豁免達成共識,WTO成員國就可以以75%的絕對多數通過豁免提案,但這將引發前所未有的動蕩。
如果WTO支持新冠疫苗專利豁免,則意味著其要面對歐盟(尤其是德國)、加拿大和英國等國的反對。
美國的立場最近從反對變成了支持。法國也持同樣立場。
支持者認為,雖然這是各國之間的爭議,但最終結果將對整個WTO產生影響。
公民全球貿易觀察(一個關注WTO和貿易協定的美國倡議組織)的創始人洛里?沃勒克稱:“面對一個世紀以來全人類面臨的最嚴峻的挑戰之一,WTO的功能反而變成了障礙,而不是提供解決方案。我認為這將是對它最后的致命一擊。”
“如果TRIPS豁免成功通過,人們把WTO視為一種拯救生命和生計的解決方案,它就能夠樹立良好的信譽,形成強大的勢頭,可以著手解決嚴重的結構性問題。”
目前,WTO存在的問題數不勝數。
改革迫在眉睫
首當其沖的是WTO的上訴機構,負責處理各成員國之間的貿易爭端。
WTO的上訴機構是國際貿易體系的核心,通常配有七名法官,但在有法官退休之后,對美國不利的決定激怒了特朗普,于是他一直阻止上訴機構任命新法官。按照規定,上訴機構處理成員國的上訴需要至少有三名法官,但在2019年年底,有兩位法官任期屆滿,導致其法官人數不足,因此該機構徹底停擺。
有人曾經希望拜登上任之后能夠扭轉這種局面,但在今年早些時候,美國拒絕了歐洲提出的填補法官職位空缺的提案,令人大失所望。
拜登政府表示:“美國對WTO上訴機構依舊有系統性擔憂。WTO成員國都知道,在過去的16年多時間里,歷任美國政府都曾經提出并解釋過這種擔憂。”
現任美國貿易代表戴琪在2月的確認聽證會上重申了美國政府的擔憂。她表示,WTO的上訴機構“在多起案件中存在越權裁決、對WTO協定解釋不當等情況,損害了美國和其他WTO成員國的利益”,并指控WTO超期裁決貿易終端。
戴琪指出:“WTO亟需改革,以確保導致這些問題出現的根本原因得以消除。”
香港中文大學的經濟法教授布萊恩?默丘里奧反對疫苗專利豁免。他說:“雖然美國一直在與WTO接觸,但沒有跡象表明美國會在短期內同意對上訴機構法官的任命。這不是好消息。在WTO的治理方面,這比支持知識產權豁免的談判更加重要。”
不止美國希望看到WTO改革。在2月發布的一份重要政策文件中,歐盟表示,推動WTO規則現代化改革的談判以失敗告終,爭端解決制度停擺,對各國貿易政策的監督無效。
于2001年加入WTO的中國也是WTO需要考慮到的重要因素之一。
默丘里奧稱:“中國當前的表現較為強勢,所以對于其認為不符合國家利益的改革措施,它不會被迫接受。”
沃勒克承認,即使WTO成功通過了對新冠疫苗和醫療用品的TRIPS專利豁免,這些問題也不會消失。她補充說:“但是,WTO一旦擁有了成為解決方案而不是障礙的經驗,就可以大幅提高各國解決這些挑戰的意愿和誠意。”
沃勒克提到了亞太經合組織貿易部長在本月初發布的一份聯合聲明。聲明呼吁緊急討論疫苗專利豁免問題。
其中有關WTO改革的部分寫道:“WTO必須證明全球貿易規則有助于解決新冠肺炎疫情這場人類大災難,并推動經濟的復蘇。”
奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉的角色
2021年年初,隨著美國特朗普政府的下臺,奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉成功接任WTO總干事,她的上任沒有受到任何阻撓。她目前正在致力于解決諸多問題,正是這些問題導致了她的前任(巴西人羅伯托?阿澤維多)的離職。
上周早些時候,美國和歐盟就波音和空中客車飛機補貼的長期貿易爭端達成五年休戰協議,當時奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉曾經發布推文稱:“只要有政治意愿,即使最棘手的問題也能夠解決。”
然而,默丘里奧卻懷疑她的管理能力能否對WTO的改革進程產生太大影響。
他說:“她在上任時曾經表示,各國代表團應該相互交流。但在最近的一次總干事會議上,各國代表只是在閱讀事先準備的報告,這被稱為是史上最糟糕的一次會議。
另一方面,恩戈齊與前任不同,她會積極尋找問題的解決方案。如果調解人的角色受到歡迎,她或許不僅可以促成談判,還將對能否最終達成協議產生影響。”
姆倫比-彼得和沃勒克都認為WTO的信譽取決于疫苗專利豁免問題。對于這種觀點,WTO秘書處發言人拒絕發表意見,而是提到了奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉在5月的一次講話。
她在講話中稱,WTO能夠幫助解決疫苗供應鏈的監督和透明,幫助制造商擴大生產,建立一個地理上更多元化的生產基地。
她在講話中還指出,各成員國“必須解決與技術轉讓、專有知識和知識產權有關的問題”,包括專利豁免提案。她說:“我們必須現在行動起來,邀請各國駐WTO大使坐上談判桌進行協商。”
“議程驅動”
大型制藥公司在這個問題上的立場是,WTO成員國不需要支持專利豁免,只要可以推動取消對醫療用品的出口限制即可。
位于日內瓦的國際藥品制造商協會聯合會的總干事托馬斯?庫尼稱:“在消除影響全球疫苗、治療藥物和診斷工具的生產分配的貿易壁壘方面,WTO依舊大有可為。”
“呼吁疫苗專利豁免背后都是出于政治考慮,是為了嘩眾取寵,在短期內不會增加疫苗產量,反而有可能毀掉幫助我們快速應對新冠肺炎疫情的框架。”
默丘里奧也認為姆倫比-彼得和沃勒克的建議都是議程驅動。
他說:“我認為,主張WTO的信譽取決于TRIPS專利豁免的結果這種觀點過于夸張。對某個話題感興趣的人都會用這樣的話術,比如環保主義者會說WTO的信譽取決于漁業補貼的結果,科技界人士會說信譽取決于電子商務和服務談判,而實業家們也會提到同樣的補貼問題。”
然而,沃勒克堅持認為專利豁免的結果不會改變WTO的制度,因為其制度已經臨時暫停了知識產權保護。她說:“這不會對TRIPS協定有任何改變。”
姆倫比-彼得表示:“WTO是一個論壇,它有應對當前疫情的相關政策工具,可以通過解決知識產權壁壘,在不同地區增加疫苗產量。”
國際藥品制造商協會聯合會的總干事庫尼指出,“專利豁免在短期內對緩解新冠肺炎疫情毫無幫助”,因為貿易壁壘和原材料短缺才是根本問題。
新建新冠疫苗生產設施確實需要技術轉讓,然而值得注意的是,在世界衛生組織于去年建立的“新冠肺炎技術獲取資源庫”中,疫苗公司沒有做出任何貢獻。該計劃的目的是希望為疫苗公司提供一種途徑,去自愿幫助愿意參與疫苗生產的其他制造商。
沃勒克表示,大量現有的產能沒有得到充分的利用。
最近,位于以色列的梯瓦制藥發布聲明,抱怨疫苗公司拒絕使用其主動提供的產能。許多公司也有類似的不滿。對此,沃勒克聲稱通過疫苗專利豁免,以及為進一步擴大產能進行注資,可以使疫苗產量快速增加數十億劑。
沃勒克表示:“你的首要任務是先踏上那條路,但隨后你就會看見一道緊鎖的大門。”
南非駐WTO大使姆倫比-彼得說:“當前的新冠肺炎疫情并未減緩,病毒變異和變種風險可能使醫療產品和醫療技術的療效受到影響,許多人的生命危在旦夕,我們希望這一切能夠讓WTO各成員國認識到情況的緊迫性。”(財富中文網)
翻譯:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
The World Trade Organization knows all about crises. Former U.S. President Donald Trump threw a wrench into its core function of resolving trade disputes—a blocker that President Joe Biden has not yet removed—and there is widespread dissatisfaction over the fairness of the global trade rulebook. The 164-country organization, under the fresh leadership of Nigeria's Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, has a lot to fix.
However, one crisis is more pressing than the others: the battle over COVID-19 vaccines, and whether the protection of their patents and other intellectual property should be temporarily lifted to boost production and end the pandemic sooner rather than later.
According to some of those pushing for the waiver—which was originally proposed last year by India and South Africa—the WTO's future rests on what happens next.
"The credibility of the WTO will depend on its ability to find a meaningful outcome on this issue that truly ramps-up and diversifies production," says Xolelwa Mlumbi-Peter, South Africa's ambassador to the WTO.
"Final nail in the coffin"
The Geneva-based WTO isn't an organization with power, as such—it's a framework within which countries make big decisions about trade, generally by consensus. It's supposed to be the forum where disputes get settled, because all its members have signed up to the same rules. And one of its most important rulebooks is the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, or TRIPS, which sprang to life alongside the WTO in 1995.
The WTO's founding agreement allows for rules to be waived in exceptional circumstances, and indeed this has happened before: its members agreed in 2003 to waive TRIPS obligations that were blocking the importation of cheap, generic drugs into developing countries that lack manufacturing capacity. (That waiver was effectively made permanent in 2017.)
Consensus is the key here.
Although the failure to reach consensus on a waiver could be overcome with a 75% supermajority vote by the WTO's membership, this would be an unprecedented and seismic event. In the case of the COVID-19 vaccine IP waiver, it would mean standing up to the European Union, and Germany in particular, as well as countries such as Canada and the U.K.—the U.S. recently flipped from opposing the idea of a waiver to supporting it, as did France.
It's a dispute between countries, but the result will be on the WTO as a whole, say waiver advocates.
"If, in the face of one of humanity's greatest challenges in a century, the WTO functionally becomes an obstacle as in contrast to part of the solution, I think it could be the final nail in the coffin" for the organization, says Lori Wallach, the founder of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, a U.S. campaigning group that focuses on the WTO and trade agreements.
"If the TRIPS waiver is successful, and people see the WTO as being part of the solution—saving lives and livelihoods—it could create goodwill and momentum to address what are still daunting structural problems."
Those problems are legion.
Reform needs
Top of the list is the WTO's Appellate Body, which hears appeals in members' trade disputes. It's a pivotal part of the international trade system, but Trump—incensed at decisions taken against the U.S. —blocked appointments to its seven-strong panel as judges retired. The body became completely paralyzed at the end of 2019, when two judges' terms ended and the panel no longer had the three-judge quorum it needs to rule on appeals.
Anyone who hoped the advent of the Biden administration would change matters was disappointed earlier this year when the U.S. rejected a European proposal to fill the vacancies. "The United States continues to have systemic concerns with the appellate body," it said. "As members know, the United States has raised and explained its systemic concerns for more than 16 years and across multiple U.S. administrations."
At her confirmation hearing in February, current U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai reiterated those concerns—she said the appellate body had "overstepped its authority and erred in interpreting WTO agreements in a number of cases, to the detriment of the United States and other WTO members," and accused it of dragging its heels in settling disputes.
"Reforms are needed to ensure that the underlying causes of such problems do not resurface," Tai said.
"While the U.S. [has] been engaging [with the WTO] it hasn't indicated it would move quickly on allowing appointments to the Appellate Body," says Bryan Mercurio, an economic-law professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, who opposes the vaccine waiver. "This is not a good sign. In terms of WTO governance, it's a much more important step than supporting negotiations on an [intellectual property] waiver."
It's not just the U.S. that wants to see reform at the WTO. In a major policy document published in February, the EU said negotiations had failed to modernize the organization's rules, the dispute-resolution system was broken, the monitoring of countries' trade policies was ineffective.
China is one of the key problems here. It became a WTO member in 2001.
"China is operating from what it sees as a position of strength, so it will not be bullied into agreeing to changes which it sees as not in its interests," says Mercurio.
All these problems won't go away if the WTO manages to come up with a TRIPS waiver for COVID-19 vaccines and medical supplies, Wallach concedes. "But," she adds, "the will and the good faith to tackle these challenges is increased enormously if the WTO has the experience of being part of the solution, not just an obstacle."
Wallach points to a statement released earlier this month by Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) trade ministers, which called for urgent discussions on the waiver. "The WTO must demonstrate that global trade rules can help address the human catastrophe of the COVID-19 pandemic and facilitate the recovery," the statement read in its section about WTO reform.
Okonjo-Iweala's role
The WTO's new director general, whose route to the top was unblocked in early 2021 with the demise of the Trump administration, is certainly keen to fix the problems that contributed to the early departure of her predecessor, Brazil's Robert Azevedo.
Earlier last week, when the U.S. and EU agreed a five-year ceasefire in a long-running dispute over Boeing and Airbus aircraft subsidies, Okonjo-Iweala tweeted: "With political will, we can solve even the most intractable problems."
However, Mercurio is skeptical about her stewardship having much of an effect on the WTO's reform process.
"Upon taking [over she] stated it was time for delegations to speak to each other and not simply past each other, but at the recent General Counsel meeting delegations simply read prepared statements in what some have described as the worst meeting ever," he says.
"On the other hand, Ngozi is very much someone who will actively seek solutions to problems, and in this way different to her predecessor. If the role of mediator is welcomed, she could have an impact not in starting discussions but in getting deals over the finish line."
A spokesperson for the WTO Secretariat declined to offer comment on Mlumbi-Peter and Wallach's suggestions that the organization's credibility rests on the vaccine patent waiver issue, but pointed to a May speech in which Okonjo-Iweala said the WTO could help tackle vaccine supply chain monitoring and transparency, helping manufacturers scale up production, and creating a more geographically diversified manufacturing base.
In her speech, the WTO chief also said members "must address issues related to technology transfer, knowhow and intellectual property," including the waiver proposal. "We must act now to get all our ambassadors to the table to negotiate a text," she said.
"Agenda driven"
Big Pharma's stance on the issue is that WTO members can help the effort without backing a waiver, but instead by pushing for the lifting of export restrictions on medical goods.
"The WTO still has much concrete work to do to remove trade barriers that are hurting manufacture and distribution of vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics globally," says Thomas Cueni, director general of the Geneva-based International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA).
"The call for waiving patents is driven by a political agenda playing to the gallery and not bringing a single more vaccine short term, but could jeopardize the very framework which has helped us to respond so fast to the COVID-19 pandemic."
Mercurio also says Mlumbi-Peter and Wallach's suggestions are agenda-driven.
"I think the comments that the WTO's credibility rests on the outcome of a TRIPS waiver are overstated, in the extreme," he says. "People with an interest in every topic say it—environmentalists say the credibility rests on the outcome of fishery subsidies, tech people say the same on the e-commerce and services negotiations, and industrialists say the same regarding subsidies."
However, Wallach insists that nothing about the waiver would change the system, because the system already provides for such temporary suspensions of intellectual-property protections. "This doesn’t change a comma in the actual TRIPS agreement," she says.
"The WTO is the relevant forum and it has the relevant policy tools to respond to the current pandemic by addressing IP barriers so as to ramp-up and diversify production across the world," says Mlumbi-Peter.
IFPMA's Cueni says "taking away the patent won’t do anything short term for the current pandemic" as the real problems are trade barriers and scarcity of raw materials. There is also a clear need for technology transfers if new COVID-19 vaccine-making facilities are to come online—though it should be noted that the vaccine companies have all failed to contribute to the World Health Organization's COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP), which was set up last year as a way for them to voluntarily help other manufacturers join the effort.
Wallach insists a great deal of existing manufacturing capacity is going untapped. Pointing to statements that have been made by the likes of Israel's Teva Pharmaceuticals, which recently complained about vaccine companies refusing to use its offered capacity, she claims the waiver could quickly unlock a billion more doses, along with the funding for further manufacturing capacity to be built out.
"The first thing you have to do is get onto the path, and there's a locked gate," says Wallach.
"We hope given the current pandemic and the risk of mutations and variants that will affect the efficacy of the medical products and technologies, as well as the need to save people's lives, that the WTO Members will recognize the urgency of the matter," says South Africa's Mlumbi-Peter.